Global reported impacts of COVID-19 on lymphoma patients and the emerging clinical management approaches in response to the ongoing pandemic.

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has dramatically impacted the health risk and management of patients with lymphoma. Clinical evaluations on the impact of COVID-19 on lymphoma patients are currently limited however, reports have shown a correlation with specific variants and more severe COVID-19 complications and higher mortality rates relative to other disease states and age-matched populations. During peak pandemic periods this created a concerning management problem for clinicians and raised the question of how different immunocompromised states increase COVID-19-associated risk and provided insights into how immunity interacts with the circulating variant, including the effects of low virulent variants in vaccinated lymphoma populations. Treatment management approaches, polymerase chain reaction tests and rapid antigen screening guidelines have been offered in an attempt to reduce the risk of harm to lymphoma patients, particularly prior to and following bone marrow or stem cell transplant. Here we systematically review the current literature to provide a novel global perspective on incidence, mortality, management and rapid antigen test (RAT) screening for COVID-19, in patients with various subtypes of lymphoma. Furthermore, lessons learned from emerging variants that continue to inform evolving lymphoma management and public health policies are addressed across these associated matters.

Experiences of Young Adults With Lymphoma During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

PURPOSE: To investigate the experiences of young adults with lymphoma during the COVID-19 pandemic. PARTICIPANTS & SETTING: 8 young adults with Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma from one National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center in the northeastern United States. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: Secondary data analysis of a study that investigated the experiences of young adults with lymphoma during acute survivorship was used. Thematic analysis was chosen for the secondary data analysis methodology. FINDINGS: Three themes define the experiences of young adults with lymphoma during the COVID-19 pandemic. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurse-led survivorship care and education of young adults with cancer may mitigate COVID-19-related anxiety and threats.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with haematologic malignancies and COVID-19 suggest that prolonged SARS-CoV-2 carriage is an important issue.

Specificities of COVID-19 disease course in patients with haematologic malignancies are still poorly studied. So, we aimed to compare patients with haematologic malignancies to patients without malignancies, matched by sex and age and hospitalised for COVID-19 at the same time and in the same centre. Among 25 patients with haematologic malignancies, we found that mortality (40% versus 4%, p < 0.01), number of days with RT-PCR positivity (21.2 ± 15.9 days [range, 3-57] versus 7.4 ± 5.6 days [range, 1-24], p < 0.01), maximal viral load (mean minimal Ct, 17.2 ± 5.2 [range, 10-30] versus 26.5 ± 5.1 [range, 15-33], p < 0.0001) and the delay between symptom onset and clinical worsening (mean time duration between symptom onset and first day of maximum requirement in inspired oxygen fraction, 14.3 ± 10.7 days versus 9.6 ± 3.7 days, p = 0.0485) were higher than in other patients. COVID-19 course in patients with haematologic malignancies has a delayed onset and is more severe with a higher mortality, and patients may be considered as super-spreaders. Clinicians and intensivists need to be trained to understand the specificity of COVID-19 courses in patients with haematological malignancies.

Epidemiology of Food Insecurity in a Nationally Representative Sample of Lymphoma Patients.

BACKGROUND: In 2020, the United States had approximately 85,000 new diagnoses of Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Food insecurity is both a direct and indirect detriment to health outcomes. The rate and risk factors for food insecurity among lymphoma patients are unknown, as the unemployment rate soars far above pre-COVID19 pandemic levels further heightening the economic stresses of a lymphoma diagnosis. METHODS: Data regarding the food security status were obtained from the cross-sectional National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A raw score compiled from a series of 10 food security questions was used to determine the Food Secure and Food Insecure groups. Respondents who reported a history of lymphoma from 2011 to 2019 were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Of the 921 patients reporting a history of lymphoma 9.06% were considered Food Insecure. The sociodemographic subgroups with the highest risk of being Food Insecure included respondents living below 100% of the Federal Poverty Level, non-US citizens, the uninsured, and those on Medicare. CONCLUSION: Food insecurity is common among lymphoma patients. Therefore, oncologists across the country should be aware of the sociodemographic risk factors for food insecurity in order to assist in mediation, maximizing the efficacy of treatments. Research regarding the impact of food insecurity on therapy compliance and patient outcomes is warranted in future studies.

SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients may be at higher risk for severe coronavirus infectious disease-19 (COVID-19); however, the outcome of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection has not been described yet. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study within the Lymphomes Oculo-Cérébraux national network (LOC) to assess the clinical characteristics and outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in PCNSL patients (positive real-time polymerase chain reaction of nasopharyngeal swab or evocative lung computed tomography scan). We compared clinical characteristics between patients with severe (death and/or intensive care unit admission) and mild disease. RESULTS: Between March and May 2020, 13 PCNSL patients were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection, 11 (85%) of whom were undergoing chemotherapy at the time of infection. The mortality rate was 23% (3/13), and two additional patients (15%) required mechanical ventilation. Two patients (15%) had no COVID-19 symptoms. History of diabetes mellitus was more common in severe patients (3/5 vs 0/8, p = 0.03). Two patients recovered from COVID-19 after mechanical ventilation during more than two weeks and resumed chemotherapy. In all, chemotherapy was resumed after COVID-19 recovery in nine patients (69%) after a median delay of 16 days (range 3-32), none of whom developed unusual chemotherapy complication nor SARS-Cov2 reactivation. CONCLUSION: This preliminary analysis suggests that, while being at higher risk be for severe illness, PCNSL patients with COVID-19 might be treated maximally especially if they achieved oncological response at the time of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Chemotherapy might be resumed without prolonged delay in PCNSL patients with COVID-19.

Evolving management strategies for lymphomas during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The evolving CoViD-19 pandemic has raised unprecedented challenges for physicians who face significant constraints in medical resources and cancer therapies. The management of patients with lymphoma represents a unique challenge given the heterogeneity of the patient population and treatment goals as well as the myriad choices of therapy available to clinicians. Adaptation in clinical practice with the goal of maintaining appropriate continuity and quality of care while mitigating exposure risk has forced clinicians around the world to develop new standards of practice and can pose difficult ethical choices in vulnerable patient populations. Based on recommendations formulated by several medical groups and societies, this article provides an overview of the general and specific practical considerations that apply to the care of lymphoma patients during the outbreak. We hope to provide a practical framework to help guide physicians in their therapeutic choices and facilitate the ongoing management of this specific patient population.

Novel insights on lymphoma and lymphomagenesis in primary Sjögren's Syndrome.

Primary Sjögren's Syndrome (pSS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by a chronic inflammatory process mainly affecting the exocrine glands but also burdened by a wide range of extraglandular manifestations. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is the most severe pSS complication worsening disease prognosis. We summarized original articles published between April 2018 and May 2020 on this topic aiming to highlight novelties on lymphoma and lymphomagenesis. Results have been grouped by epidemiology, etiopathogenesis and predictors of lymphoma. NHL is the most severe complication of pSS and occurs in around 5-10% of patients. Over the last two years, several clinical, serological, and histopathological features have been proposed as predictive for lymphoma in pSS patients, allowing early diagnosis and consequently, better management and prognosis. Individual monitoring for disease activity and possible lymphoma development is a central clue in the evaluation of pSS patients.

Diagnosing lymphoma in the shadow of an epidemic: lessons learned from the diagnostic challenges posed by the dual tuberculosis and HIV epidemics.

Infectious disease epidemics may overshadow and exacerbate existing challenges in diagnosing lymphoma. We describe pragmatic strategies we have implemented to overcome diagnostic obstacles caused by the local tuberculosis (TB) and HIV epidemics in South Africa, which may serve as a guide to minimize diagnostic delay during the COVID-19 pandemic. We report on the diagnostic utility of a rapid-access lymph node core-biopsy clinic, where lymph node biopsies are taken from outpatients at their first visit. Analysis of tissue biopsies (n = 110) revealed the three most common conditions diagnosed were TB adenitis (34%), lymphoma (29%), and disseminated malignancy (20%). A first-attempt core-biopsy was able to diagnose lymphoma in 27/32 (84%) of cases. Compared with a historical cohort, the diagnostic interval (time from first health visit to diagnostic biopsy) for patients with lymphoma was significantly shorter, 13.5 vs 48 days (p = 0.002).